Kuroma Kuroma

claude.ai scores 53/100 for AI Readiness

Sign in (claude.ai) scores 53/100 (grade B) on AI Readiness, audited 28 Jul 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (89) and its weakest is AI Readiness (34); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 0/100 (No case studies or concrete examples found).

Audited URL: https://claude.ai/

53/100
Grade
B

This audit is 50 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 50 days ago

Is claude.ai ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: claude.ai scores 53/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Expand Content Depth & Comprehensiveness and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

This audit did not record which rubric version scored it, so it is not confirmed as the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 51
Technical Optimization 89
Authority Signals 48
AI Readiness 34

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 50/100

    Found: 412 words, 6 paragraphs, 22 lists, 1 images (1 with alt text)

    • Content length (412 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 63/100

    FAQ section found (no schema). 6 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 30/100

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, Organization

  • AI Readability Score Pass 75/100

    Average 11 words/sentence. 4 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 43/100

    H1: 0, H2: 3, H3: 33. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 42/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 images have generic or filename-only alt text (e.g. "image", "chart", a filename) that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 1 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 1 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 20/100

    Experience: 0/25. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 65/100

    204 external links, 2 citation phrases, 5 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 53/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social Links

AI Readiness

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card