Kuroma Kuroma

gpt.com scores 48/100 for AI Readiness

ChatGPT (gpt.com) scores 48/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 8 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (82) and its weakest is Authority Signals (34); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose).

Audited URL: https://gpt.com

48/100
Grade
C

This audit is 39 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 39 days ago

Is gpt.com ready for AI search?

Partly: gpt.com scores 48/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Implement Comprehensive Schema Markup and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-04, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 37
Technical Optimization 82
Authority Signals 34
AI Readiness 45

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 53/100

    Found: 5165 words, 3 paragraphs, 1 lists

    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 23/100

    No FAQ structure. 2 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Fail 22/100

    H1: 2, H2: 1, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (2) - should have exactly one
    • Insufficient H2 headings for content sections
  • Media Accessibility Pass 85/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 20/100

    Experience: 0/25. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 45/100

    4 external links, 3 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 35/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card