Kuroma Kuroma

circledna.com scores 64/100 for AI Readiness

World's Most Comprehensive DNA Test (circledna.com) is a Executive Health Screening site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 64/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (82) and its weakest is AI Readiness (53); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 0/100 (No recent year references in content). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://circledna.com

64/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 42/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is circledna.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: circledna.com scores 64/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Update Content Freshness and Make Media Machine-Readable to AI.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 82
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 57
Authority Signals 25% of the score 65
AI Readiness 30% of the score 53

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.5 pts

    On https://circledna.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 42/100

    • 167 of 301 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at circledna.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • This page opens 51 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at circledna.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  2. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://circledna.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://circledna.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.2 pts

    On https://circledna.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 58/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.2 pts

    On https://circledna.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 37/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • 6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3164 words, 117 paragraphs, 53 lists, 2 tables, 174 images (4 with alt text)

    • 170 images missing alt text (e.g. //circledna.com/cdn/shop/files/Frame_377528_3.png?v=1746034878&width=600, //circledna.com/cdn/shop/files/Frame_377528.png?v=1746034685&width=600, //circledna.com/cdn/shop/files/Frame_377528_1.png?v=1746034…
  • 6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 2 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

  • 4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 99/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 73/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 16, H3: 25. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Fail 12/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 170 of 174 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("CircleDNA Online", "CircleDNA Online").
    • 69 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 174 images but only ~3164 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • 1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • 2% of the overall score

    5 render-blocking resources. 3395 elements for 3164 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 163 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 42/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 167 placeholder links

    • 167 of 301 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at circledna.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 61/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 15/25. Trust: 10/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • 9% of the overall score

    7 external links, 0 citation phrases, 27 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 78/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (2)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 84/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    19 of 47 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 6 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 58/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 18 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 37/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    12 of 177 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 66/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 66/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3164 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other Executive Health Screening sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.