Kuroma Kuroma

webdesignsbychris.com scores 45/100 for AI Readiness

Web Design Clarksville TN (webdesignsbychris.com) scores 45/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 19 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (56) and its weakest is AI Readiness (33); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://webdesignsbychris.com

45/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 41/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 27 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 27 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is webdesignsbychris.com ready for AI search?

Partly: webdesignsbychris.com scores 45/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 49
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 56
Authority Signals 25% of the score 47
AI Readiness 30% of the score 33

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.7 pts

    On https://webdesignsbychris.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 41/100

    • 7 of 46 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at webdesignsbychris.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • This page opens 10 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at webdesignsbychris.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://webdesignsbychris.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://webdesignsbychris.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://webdesignsbychris.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://webdesignsbychris.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 93/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1428 words, 39 paragraphs, 5 lists, 6 images (6 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: BreadcrumbList, Person, WebPage, WebSite, Organization

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 3 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 77/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 15 words/sentence. 10 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 1. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 63/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("nextdoor", "footer logo").
    • 1 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    0 render-blocking resources. 497 elements for 1428 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 1 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 7 placeholder links

    • 7 of 46 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at webdesignsbychris.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 60/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 18/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 17/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    16 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 48/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (3)

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 43/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    2 of 23 headings open a quotable passage, 3 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 65/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 8/10/2026

    • No recent year references in content
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 27 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 52/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 52/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1428 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card