Kuroma Kuroma

interplan.com.tw scores 40/100 for AI Readiness

Interplan International Corp. (interplan.com.tw) scores 40/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 27 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (50) and its weakest is AI Readiness (30); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it above the median of the 31,080 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://interplan.com.tw

40/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 32/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 8.8 points off the overall score.

Updated 3 days ago

Above the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 31,080 audited sites

Is interplan.com.tw ready for AI search?

Not yet: interplan.com.tw scores 40/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 39
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 50
Authority Signals 25% of the score 43
AI Readiness 30% of the score 30

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +8.8 pts

    On https://interplan.com.tw · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 32/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 7 of 95 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at interplan.com.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 0 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://interplan.com.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://interplan.com.tw · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://interplan.com.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  5. Add Trust Signals up to +5.8 pts

    On https://interplan.com.tw · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 36/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Your Organization schema declares 4 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 71/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 688 words, 20 paragraphs, 7 lists, 31 images (2 with alt text)

    • Content length (688 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 29 images missing alt text (e.g. //www.interplan.group/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/InterplanXHakuhodo-BANNER-2480x1736-1.png, //www.interplan.group/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/kv_bg.jpg, //www.interplan.group/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Inter…
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 5 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 80/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 71/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 4, H2: 3, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (4) - should have exactly one
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 39/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 26 of 28 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 14 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 28 images but only ~688 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 69/100

    2% of the overall score

    6 render-blocking resources. 880 elements for 688 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 24 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 32/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 7 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 7 of 95 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at interplan.com.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 63/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 18/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 25/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    88 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 36/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Contact, Social profiles (1)

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 30/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    1 of 16 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 45/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References last year. Last modified: 4/8/2021

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 10/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 24 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 3 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 79/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 79/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    688 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card