Kuroma Kuroma

apitc.org scores 32/100 for AI Readiness

APITC (apitc.org) scores 32/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 16 Jul 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (67) and its weakest is Authority Signals (14); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No JSON-LD structured data found).

Audited URL: https://apitc.org

32/100
Grade
F

This audit is 62 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 62 days ago

Is apitc.org ready for AI search?

Not yet: apitc.org scores 32/100 (grade F). Start with Implement Comprehensive Schema Markup and Expand Content Depth & Comprehensiveness.

Category scores

This audit did not record which rubric version scored it, so it is not confirmed as the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 35
Technical Optimization 67
Authority Signals 14
AI Readiness 22

The 15 checks this audit confirms it scored

Every check this audit confirms it scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score. 2 other checks are listed without a share of the score, because this audit cannot confirm whether they counted on this page.

On-Page Content

  • Found: 101 words, 2 paragraphs, 5 lists, 2 tables, 55 images (0 with alt text)

    • Content length (101 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 55 images missing alt text (e.g. theme/pic/logo-ver2.png, files/slide_show/21052001575003, files/slide_show/21052001575004)
  • Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No JSON-LD structured data found
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    Average 3 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 30/100

    H1: 1, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Insufficient H2 headings for content sections
  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 55 of 55 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 55 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 55 images but only ~101 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
    • 1 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 19/100

    Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    Experience: 0/25. Expertise: 16/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • 0 external links, 2 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 15/100

    Present: SSL

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 32/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 2 tables

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 55/100

    References current year

    • No article publish/modified dates in metadata
  • 0 unique value phrases, 0 differentiators, 0 case study mentions.

    • No case studies or concrete examples found
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 0/100

    Score: 0/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Partial 70/100

    101 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card