Kuroma Kuroma

www.edb.gov.sg scores 51/100 for AI Readiness

Economic Development Board (www.edb.gov.sg) scores 51/100 (grade B) on AI Readiness, audited 17 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (74) and its weakest is AI Readiness (29); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 7 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,931 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.edb.gov.sg

51/100
Grade
B

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

Updated today

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,931 audited sites

Is www.edb.gov.sg ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: www.edb.gov.sg scores 51/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 56
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 74
Authority Signals 25% of the score 54
AI Readiness 30% of the score 29

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://www.edb.gov.sg · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://www.edb.gov.sg · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +5.8 pts

    On https://www.edb.gov.sg · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 20/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 1 of your 16 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.6 pts

    On https://www.edb.gov.sg · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 10/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://www.edb.gov.sg · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 7 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • 6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3,269 words, 29 paragraphs, 8 lists, 32 images (32 with alt text)

  • 6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 3 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • 4.5% of the overall score

    4 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: GovernmentOrganization, BreadcrumbList, WebPage

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 7 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 6 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 60/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 2, H2: 5, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (2) - should have exactly one
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Partial 57/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("logo") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 8 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("SG Mark Logo", "Video thumbnail", "LinkedIn Icon").
    • 20 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • 1% of the overall score

    4 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • 2% of the overall score

    12 render-blocking resources. 2,067 elements for 3,269 words

    • 12 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 15 responsive images

  • 13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 42 placeholder links

    • 42 of 107 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 38/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • 9% of the overall score

    23 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 85/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 20/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    1 of 16 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 79/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 9/17/2026

  • 5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 304 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 3 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 68/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 68/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card