Kuroma Kuroma

www.surglasses.com scores 59/100 for AI Readiness

Surglasses (www.surglasses.com) scores 59/100 (grade A) on AI Readiness, audited 28 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Authority Signals (69) and its weakest is On-Page Content (51); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 5/100 (No recent year references in content). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.surglasses.com

59/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 41/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 17 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 17 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is www.surglasses.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: www.surglasses.com scores 59/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 51
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 56
Authority Signals 25% of the score 69
AI Readiness 30% of the score 59

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.7 pts

    On https://www.surglasses.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 41/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 4 of 130 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.surglasses.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 25 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +5.8 pts

    On https://www.surglasses.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 11/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Update Content Freshness up to +5.4 pts

    On https://www.surglasses.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 5/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://www.surglasses.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.9 pts

    On https://www.surglasses.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 13/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 83/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1465 words, 72 paragraphs, 7 lists, 23 images (18 with alt text)

    • 5 images missing alt text (e.g. ../assets/img/award-te-2024.webp, ../assets/img/award-te-2020.webp, ../assets/img/award-edison-2019.webp)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 11/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 13/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization

  • AI Readability Score Pass 84/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 7 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 13, H3: 9. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 44/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 5 of 23 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Surglasses", "Surglasses").
    • 14 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 7 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 80/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    1 render-blocking resources. 673 elements for 1465 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 78/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 2 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 4 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 4 of 130 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.surglasses.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 68/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 7/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    4 external links, 1 citation phrases, 17 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 85/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 52/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    14 of 23 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 85/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    1 original data indicators, 17 percentages, 3 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 5/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 63/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    10 of 103 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 89/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 89/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1465 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card