Kuroma
winningbydesign.com scores 74/100 for AI Readiness
Winning by Design (winningbydesign.com) is a Sales Enablement site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 74/100 (grade A+), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (83) and its weakest is AI Readiness (62); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 13/100 (2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization, FAQPage). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://winningbydesign.com
The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 30/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 5.3 points off the overall score.
This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites
Is winningbydesign.com ready for AI search?
Largely yes: winningbydesign.com scores 74/100 (grade A+). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts
On https://winningbydesign.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.9 pts
On https://winningbydesign.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 13/100
- Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.7 pts
On https://winningbydesign.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 28/100
- Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
- Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +2.7 pts
On https://winningbydesign.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 79/100
- 38 of 279 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- This page opens 84 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
- Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
-
Add External Citations & References up to +2.7 pts
On https://winningbydesign.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 70/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 3802 words, 128 paragraphs, 65 lists, 70 images (70 with alt text)
-
6.5% of the overall score
FAQ schema present. 15 question headings. 10 questions detected in content
-
4.5% of the overall score
2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization, FAQPage
-
3% of the overall score
Average 12 words/sentence. 16 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 9, H3: 35. Hierarchy issues.
- Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 5 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Home Image", "binoculars icon", "handshake icon").
- 26 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
9 render-blocking resources. 2078 elements for 3802 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 37 responsive images. has theme-color
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 38 placeholder links
- 38 of 279 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 16/25. Authority: 22/25. Trust: 20/25
- No author attribution found
-
9% of the overall score
30 external links, 0 citation phrases, 9 statistics. Has references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (2)
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
26 of 58 headings open a quotable passage, 3 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 2 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
References current year. Last modified: 8/19/2026
-
5.1% of the overall score
2 of 270 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 73/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
3802 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther Sales Enablement sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.