Kuroma Kuroma

gradiant.com scores 63/100 for AI Readiness

gradiant.com is a Energy / CleanTech site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 63/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (73) and its weakest is Authority Signals (59); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 25/100 (2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Corporation, ItemList). That places it in the top quartile of the 333 Energy / CleanTech sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://gradiant.com

63/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Structured Data Quality: it scored 25/100 on a check worth 6.7% of the total, which takes 5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Energy / CleanTech Median 38 · Top quartile 42 · across 333 audited sites in Energy / CleanTech

Is gradiant.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: gradiant.com scores 63/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Page Performance Indicators.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 64
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 73
Authority Signals 25% of the score 59
AI Readiness 30% of the score 59

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +5 pts

    On https://gradiant.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 25/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.9 pts

    On https://gradiant.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 30/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.4 pts

    On https://gradiant.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 42/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://gradiant.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.6 pts

    On https://gradiant.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 30/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

The 17 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 81/100

    9.7% of the overall score

    Found: 1291 words, 76 paragraphs, 24 lists, 11 images (8 with alt text)

    • 3 images missing alt text (e.g. (inline image), gradiant.com, /wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Instagram.svg)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 25/100

    6.7% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Corporation, ItemList

  • AI Readability Score Partial 68/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 7 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 86/100

    4.1% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 12, H3: 13. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 3 of 11 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 8 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Linkedin", "instagram", "Twitter").
    • 2 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 1 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 26/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3218ms). 68 render-blocking resources. 1953 elements for 1291 words

    • Server response was slow (3218ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 68 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 1 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 79/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 17 placeholder links

    • 17 of 151 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 30/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    17 external links, 0 citation phrases, 5 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 85/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 66/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    11 of 31 headings open a quotable passage, 3 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 42/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 85/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/7/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 30/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    3 of 64 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 62/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 62/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1291 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Energy / CleanTech sites

Other Energy / CleanTech sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.