Kuroma Kuroma

xurih.com scores 36/100 for AI Readiness

XURIH (xurih.com) scores 36/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 14 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (71) and its weakest is AI Readiness (20); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://xurih.com

36/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 32 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 32 days ago

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is xurih.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: xurih.com scores 36/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 31
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 71
Authority Signals 25% of the score 33
AI Readiness 30% of the score 20

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://xurih.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +6.8 pts

    On https://xurih.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 25/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://xurih.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.4 pts

    On https://xurih.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 9/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +5.3 pts

    On https://xurih.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 27/100

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add a section heading followed by 25 to 200 words that answer it on their own, so an assistant can lift the answer without the rest of the page
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 56/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 148 words, 45 paragraphs, 3 lists, 19 images (4 with alt text)

    • Content length (148 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 15 images missing alt text (e.g. /_next/image?url=%2Flogo.png&w=96&q=75, /projects/interior-02.png, /projects/interior-06.png)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 3 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 4 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 62/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 3, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Fail 22/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 15 of 19 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Cozy Glamping", "Mountain Starry").
    • 18 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 19 images but only ~148 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 80/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 59/100

    2% of the overall score

    7 render-blocking resources. 480 elements for 148 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 1 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 72/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 2 of 22 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 9/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 25/100

    9% of the overall score

    3 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 60/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Contact, Social profiles (3)

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 27/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    0 of 3 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 17 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 77/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 77/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card