Kuroma Kuroma

ai.qunyu.site scores 28/100 for AI Readiness

小羽AI (ai.qunyu.site) scores 28/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 11 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (39) and its weakest is Authority Signals (16); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose). That places it below the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://ai.qunyu.site

28/100
Grade
F

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 23/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 10 points off the overall score.

Updated 4 days ago

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is ai.qunyu.site ready for AI search?

Not yet: ai.qunyu.site scores 28/100 (grade F). Start with Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 39
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 39
Authority Signals 25% of the score 16
AI Readiness 30% of the score 23

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +10 pts

    On https://ai.qunyu.site · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 23/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 4 of 17 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at ai.qunyu.site is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • This page opens 4 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Add Trust Signals up to +8.5 pts

    On https://ai.qunyu.site · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 5/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.4 pts

    On https://ai.qunyu.site · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 9/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +6 pts

    On https://ai.qunyu.site · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 33/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  5. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6 pts

    On https://ai.qunyu.site · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 20/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Needs work 45/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 202 words, 16 paragraphs, 2 images (2 with alt text)

    • Content length (202 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 25/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 5 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 69/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 3, H3: 11. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 63/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("logo") that tells AI nothing about the content.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Fail 20/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 91/100

    2% of the overall score

    1 render-blocking resources. 389 elements for 202 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Fail 23/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 4 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 4 of 17 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at ai.qunyu.site is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 9/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 4/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 33/100

    9% of the overall score

    3 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 5/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Social profiles (1)

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 49/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    3 of 15 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 20/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 24 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 55/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 55/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card