Kuroma Kuroma

boldtek.com scores 52/100 for AI Readiness

Innovative IT Consulting Services for Your Business (boldtek.com) scores 52/100 (grade B) on AI Readiness, audited 26 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (58) and its weakest is AI Readiness (45); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 9/100 (1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: ProfessionalService, Organization, WebSite, ImageObject, ContactPage). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://boldtek.com

52/100
Grade
B

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 41/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 20 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 20 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is boldtek.com ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: boldtek.com scores 52/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 58
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 51
Authority Signals 25% of the score 56
AI Readiness 30% of the score 45

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.7 pts

    On https://boldtek.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 41/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 10 of 73 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at boldtek.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 32 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6 pts

    On https://boldtek.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 20/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://boldtek.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.2 pts

    On https://boldtek.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 17/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.1 pts

    On https://boldtek.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 9/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • 6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1312 words, 26 paragraphs, 9 lists, 56 images (50 with alt text)

    • 6 images missing alt text (e.g. , …
  • 6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 3 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • 4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: ProfessionalService, Organization, WebSite, ImageObject, ContactPage

  • AI Readability Score Partial 68/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 4, H3: 15. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 43/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 6 of 56 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 3 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("image", "image", "image") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 18 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("BoldTek", "03", "software-testing-2").
    • 34 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • 1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • 2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3676ms). 9 render-blocking resources. 1299 elements for 1312 words

    • Server response was slow (3676ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 13 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 10 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 10 of 73 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at boldtek.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 66/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 10/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • 9% of the overall score

    13 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 68/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 52/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    2 of 20 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 20/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 5 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 65/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 7/30/2026

    • No recent year references in content
  • 5.1% of the overall score

    2 of 91 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 75/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 75/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1312 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card