Kuroma Kuroma

www.tm-robot.com scores 37/100 for AI Readiness

www.tm-robot.com scores 37/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 24 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (67) and its weakest is AI Readiness (23); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.tm-robot.com

37/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 21 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 21 days ago

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is www.tm-robot.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: www.tm-robot.com scores 37/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 33
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 67
Authority Signals 25% of the score 33
AI Readiness 30% of the score 23

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://www.tm-robot.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://www.tm-robot.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://www.tm-robot.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.7 pts

    On https://www.tm-robot.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 19/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://www.tm-robot.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 66/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 433 words, 16 paragraphs, 9 lists, 31 images (22 with alt text)

    • Content length (433 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 9 images missing alt text (e.g. /images/deco/blue-shadow.png, /images/deco/blue-shadow.png, /images/deco/green-shadow.png)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 7 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 12 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 47/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 8, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 28/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 9 of 31 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 3 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("img", "img", "img") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 14 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("techman logo", "TM12", "TM14").
    • 22 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 19/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 41/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 48/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    5 of 18 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 27 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 68/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 68/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    433 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card