Kuroma
pdftomd.tools scores 51/100 for AI Readiness
PDF to MD Converter (pdftomd.tools) scores 51/100 (grade B) on AI Readiness, audited 28 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (71) and its weakest is Authority Signals (37); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 0/100 (Limited use of specific statistics). That places it in the top quartile of the 31,080 sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://pdftomd.tools
The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 41/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.7 points off the overall score.
Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 31,080 audited sites
Is pdftomd.tools ready for AI search?
Mostly, with gaps: pdftomd.tools scores 51/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.7 pts
On https://pdftomd.tools · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 41/100
- 12 of 82 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- The response at pdftomd.tools is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
- This page opens 24 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
- Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
- Serve a plain-text robots.txt at pdftomd.tools — the response we received could not be parsed as one
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts
On https://pdftomd.tools · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100
- Limited use of specific statistics
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts
On https://pdftomd.tools · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
- Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.7 pts
On https://pdftomd.tools · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 19/100
- No author attribution found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts
On https://pdftomd.tools · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
- Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
- Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 1,112 words, 43 paragraphs, 6 lists, 13 images (13 with alt text)
-
6.5% of the overall score
FAQ schema present. 3 question headings. 1 questions detected in content
-
4.5% of the overall score
4 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, Organization, WebApplication, WebPage, FAQPage
-
3% of the overall score
Average 10 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 11, H3: 8. Proper hierarchy.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 11 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
4 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
4 render-blocking resources. 589 elements for 1,112 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. has theme-color
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 12 placeholder links
- 12 of 82 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- The response at pdftomd.tools is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 14/25
- No author attribution found
-
9% of the overall score
16 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Social profiles (1)
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
5 of 20 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
5.7% of the overall score
References current year. Last modified: 10/20/2026
-
5.1% of the overall score
0 of 73 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 72/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
1,112 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card