Kuroma Kuroma

gitresume.co scores 46/100 for AI Readiness

GitResume (gitresume.co) scores 46/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (58) and its weakest is Authority Signals (31); the biggest single gap is E-E-A-T Signals at 19/100 (No author attribution found).

Audited URL: https://gitresume.co

46/100
Grade
C

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is gitresume.co ready for AI search?

Partly: gitresume.co scores 46/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 58
Technical Optimization 52
Authority Signals 31
AI Readiness 43

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 88/100

    Found: 1121 words, 19 paragraphs, 7 lists, 6 images (5 with alt text)

    • 1 images missing alt text (e.g. /globe.svg)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 23/100

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 30/100

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, WebApplication

  • AI Readability Score Pass 75/100

    Average 11 words/sentence. 9 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    H1: 1, H2: 7, H3: 7. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 52/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("GitResume", "GitResume").
    • 3 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 1 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 81/100

    5 render-blocking resources. 1385 elements for 1121 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 9 placeholder links

    • 9 of 51 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at gitresume.co is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 19/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 45/100

    1 external links, 2 citation phrases, 9 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 25/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card