Kuroma Kuroma

tech.us scores 67/100 for AI Readiness

Hire Expert AI & Custom Software Developers (tech.us) is a information technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 67/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (82) and its weakest is AI Readiness (39); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 0/100 (No recent year references in content). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://tech.us

67/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Content Freshness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 5.7% of the total, which takes 5.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is tech.us ready for AI search?

Largely yes: tech.us scores 67/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Update Content Freshness and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 79
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 82
Authority Signals 25% of the score 77
AI Readiness 30% of the score 39

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://tech.us · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.5 pts

    On https://tech.us · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 40/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.3 pts

    On https://tech.us · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 16/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.7 pts

    On https://tech.us · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 45/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +2.7 pts

    On https://tech.us · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 70/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."

The 17 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    9.7% of the overall score

    Found: 3272 words, 174 paragraphs, 65 lists, 215 images (190 with alt text)

    • 25 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    FAQ schema present. 0 question headings. 5 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 45/100

    6.7% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, ProfessionalService, Person, WebSite, WebPage, OfferCatalog, ItemList, Review, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 79/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 9 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 83/100

    4.1% of the overall score

    H1: 7, H2: 14, H3: 23. Proper hierarchy.

    • Multiple H1 headings (7) - should have exactly one
  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 25 of 215 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 183 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Tech.us", "arrow", "Construction").
    • 79 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 215 images but only ~3272 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    49 render-blocking resources. 2551 elements for 3272 words

    • 49 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 36 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 25 placeholder links

    • 25 of 252 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 65/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 10/10. Expertise: 16/25. Authority: 22/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    16 external links, 0 citation phrases, 5 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 93/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 65/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    10 of 44 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 2 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 16/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    4 of 185 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 60/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 60/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3272 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited information technology sites

Other information technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.