Kuroma Kuroma

effectstudio.com.tw scores 36/100 for AI Readiness

Effect Studio (effectstudio.com.tw) scores 36/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 15 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (52) and its weakest is Authority Signals (25); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 7 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it below the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://effectstudio.com.tw

36/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 31 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 31 days ago

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is effectstudio.com.tw ready for AI search?

Not yet: effectstudio.com.tw scores 36/100 (grade D). Start with Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 46
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 52
Authority Signals 25% of the score 25
AI Readiness 30% of the score 26

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +9 pts

    On https://effectstudio.com.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 0/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  2. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.7 pts

    On https://effectstudio.com.tw · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 41/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 4 of 69 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at effectstudio.com.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 24 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.8 pts

    On https://effectstudio.com.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 10/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://effectstudio.com.tw · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://effectstudio.com.tw · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 80/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 653 words, 45 paragraphs, 10 lists, 100 images (100 with alt text)

    • Content length (653 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 28/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: LocalBusiness

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 7 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 69/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 3 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 66/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 3, H3: 25. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 3 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("橫幅", "橫幅", "橫幅") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 50 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("header", "header", "查看更多").
    • 83 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 100 images but only ~653 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 80/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 59/100

    2% of the overall score

    14 render-blocking resources. 898 elements for 653 words

    • 14 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 4 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 4 of 69 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at effectstudio.com.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 30/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 0/100

    9% of the overall score

    0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 47/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Contact

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 46/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    6 of 67 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 10/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 54 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 72/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 72/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    653 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card