Kuroma Kuroma

tillmac.com scores 31/100 for AI Readiness

TillMac (tillmac.com) scores 31/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 9 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (53) and its weakest is On-Page Content (20); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://tillmac.com

31/100
Grade
F

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 41/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.7 points off the overall score.

Updated 5 days ago

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is tillmac.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: tillmac.com scores 31/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 20
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 53
Authority Signals 25% of the score 24
AI Readiness 30% of the score 31

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.7 pts

    On https://tillmac.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 41/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 1 of 13 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at tillmac.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 8 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +7.7 pts

    On https://tillmac.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 15/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://tillmac.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +7 pts

    On https://tillmac.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  5. Expand Content Depth & Comprehensiveness up to +6.1 pts

    On https://tillmac.com · On-Page Content → Content Depth & Comprehensiveness, scored 13/100

    • Content length (82 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
    • Expand content to at least 1,500 words (currently 82)
    • Add 2-3 subsections covering related aspects of your topic
    • Add bulleted or numbered lists for key points

The 18 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 1 more check was not scored on this page and is listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Fail 13/100

    7% of the overall score

    Found: 82 words, 4 paragraphs

    • Content length (82 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    7% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.8% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Person, WebSite, BreadcrumbList

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3.2% of the overall score

    Average 6 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 61/100

    3% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 0, H3: 3. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Not scored on this page: no images, video or audio to make readable

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 70/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 56/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3531ms). 2 render-blocking resources. 166 elements for 82 words

    • Server response was slow (3531ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 1 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 1 of 13 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at tillmac.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 19/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Fail 15/100

    9% of the overall score

    1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 36/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Social profiles (1)

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 48/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    1 of 4 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 67/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 4/21/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 8 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 41/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 41/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Needs work 46/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    82 words readable without JavaScript

    • Only 82 words are readable without JavaScript; AI crawlers run no JavaScript and will see very little of this page.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card