Kuroma Kuroma

wan3video.art scores 58/100 for AI Readiness

wan3video.art scores 58/100 (grade A) on AI Readiness, audited 27 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (72) and its weakest is Authority Signals (47); the biggest single gap is Raw HTML Availability at 10/100 (This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://wan3video.art

58/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in E-E-A-T Signals: it scored 21/100 on a check worth 7% of the total, which takes 5.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 19 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 19 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is wan3video.art ready for AI search?

Largely yes: wan3video.art scores 58/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Raw HTML Availability.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 68
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 72
Authority Signals 25% of the score 47
AI Readiness 30% of the score 51

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.5 pts

    On https://wan3video.art · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 21/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.1 pts

    On https://wan3video.art · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 32/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +4.6 pts

    On https://wan3video.art · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 65/100

    • 20 of 49 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
    • This page opens 8 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +4.5 pts

    On https://wan3video.art · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 50/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.2 pts

    On https://wan3video.art · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 18/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 82/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1363 words, 98 paragraphs, 7 lists, 28 images (22 with alt text)

    • 6 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 86/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 4 question headings. 3 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 16/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, WebPage, SoftwareApplication, VideoObject, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 86/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 25. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 58/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 6 of 28 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 4 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Runway energy", "Sound-led moment", "Product turntable").
    • 10 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 28 images but only ~1363 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    1 render-blocking resources. 1002 elements for 1363 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 65/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 20 placeholder links

    • 20 of 49 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 21/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 50/100

    9% of the overall score

    16 external links, 0 citation phrases, 3 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 64/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Social profiles (1)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 65/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    7 of 36 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 32/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 2 percentages, 6 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 85/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/2/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 18/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    1 of 112 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 4 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card