Kuroma Kuroma

alignerco.com scores 66/100 for AI Readiness

alignerco.com is a HealthTech site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 66/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (76) and its weakest is Technical Optimization (61); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 32/100 (3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://alignerco.com

66/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 53/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 6.1 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is alignerco.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: alignerco.com scores 66/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Make Media Machine-Readable to AI.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 76
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 61
Authority Signals 25% of the score 62
AI Readiness 30% of the score 63

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.1 pts

    On https://alignerco.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 53/100

    • 18 of 211 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at alignerco.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • This page opens 98 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at alignerco.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://alignerco.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://alignerco.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.1 pts

    On https://alignerco.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 32/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3 pts

    On https://alignerco.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 58/100

    • 14 of your 70 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2873 words, 145 paragraphs, 35 lists, 166 images (141 with alt text)

    • 25 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 81/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ section found (no schema). 7 question headings. 3 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 32/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Pass 94/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 88/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 16, H3: 44. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 34/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 25 of 166 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 1 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("Icon") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 75 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Experiences", "Stories", "ALIGNERCO").
    • 104 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    30 render-blocking resources. 2231 elements for 2873 words

    • 30 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 78/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 13 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 53/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 18 placeholder links

    • 18 of 211 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at alignerco.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 60/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 13/25. Authority: 15/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    23 external links, 0 citation phrases, 31 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (5)

    • No about or company page linked from this page

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 58/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    14 of 70 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 14 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 79/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/14/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 51/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    10 of 192 passages carry a figure, 6 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 76/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 76/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2873 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other HealthTech sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.