Kuroma Kuroma

www.eclife.com.tw scores 21/100 for AI Readiness

EcLife良興購物網 (www.eclife.com.tw) scores 21/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 5 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (39) and its weakest is AI Readiness (8); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.eclife.com.tw

21/100
Grade
F

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 31/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 9 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 9 days ago

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is www.eclife.com.tw ready for AI search?

Not yet: www.eclife.com.tw scores 21/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 28
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 39
Authority Signals 25% of the score 15
AI Readiness 30% of the score 8

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +9 pts

    On https://www.eclife.com.tw · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 31/100

    • 50 of 70 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.eclife.com.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Add lang attribute to HTML element
    • This page opens 14 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Add Trust Signals up to +7.5 pts

    On https://www.eclife.com.tw · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 17/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://www.eclife.com.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +7.2 pts

    On https://www.eclife.com.tw · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 0/100

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add a section heading followed by 25 to 200 words that answer it on their own, so an assistant can lift the answer without the rest of the page
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +7 pts

    On https://www.eclife.com.tw · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 0/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 55/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 126 words, 11 paragraphs, 4 lists, 35 images (3 with alt text)

    • Content length (126 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 32 images missing alt text (e.g. (inline image), (inline image), (inline image))
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Needs work 45/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 4 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

    • No block of writing on this page reads as a paragraph, so paragraph length could not be judged
  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 58/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 16, H3: 2. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Fail 21/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 32 of 35 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("裝飾").
    • 29 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 35 images but only ~126 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 49/100

    2% of the overall score

    11 render-blocking resources. 389 elements for 126 words

    • 11 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 31/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 50 placeholder links

    • 50 of 70 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.eclife.com.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 25/100

    9% of the overall score

    4 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 17/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Social profiles (1)

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 0/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    0 of 23 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 5 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 51/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 51/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Partial 59/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    126 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card