Kuroma
addx.co scores 57/100 for AI Readiness
addx.co is a Asset & Wealth Management site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 57/100 (grade B), audited 25 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (67) and its weakest is AI Readiness (47); the biggest single gap is Media Accessibility at 5/100 (99 of 99 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://addx.co
The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 30/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 5.3 points off the overall score.
This audit is 21 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites
Is addx.co ready for AI search?
Mostly, with gaps: addx.co scores 57/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Make Media Machine-Readable to AI and Improve Unique Value Proposition.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts
On https://addx.co · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Add Trust Signals up to +4.7 pts
On https://addx.co · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 48/100
- Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
- Add customer testimonials or reviews
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.4 pts
On https://addx.co · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 37/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts
On https://addx.co · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.9 pts
On https://addx.co · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 24/100
- Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
- Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 1988 words, 30 paragraphs, 11 lists, 99 images (0 with alt text)
- 99 images missing alt text (e.g. /icons/singpass_logo_f157b4f8bc.svg, /images/origin/star_389b641154.png , /images/origin/license_ee9607be8a.png )
-
6.5% of the overall score
FAQ section found (no schema). 6 question headings. 3 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
-
4.5% of the overall score
No JSON-LD structured data found
-
3% of the overall score
Average 11 words/sentence. 17 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 5, H2: 11, H3: 13. Hierarchy issues.
- Multiple H1 headings (5) - should have exactly one
- Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 99 of 99 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 5 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 99 images but only ~1988 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
17 render-blocking resources. 984 elements for 1988 words
- 17 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. has theme-color
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 23 placeholder links
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
- 23 of 88 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 13/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 10/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
7 external links, 1 citation phrases, 6 statistics. No references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (1)
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
11 of 29 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 5 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
References current year
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
5.1% of the overall score
6 of 131 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 91/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
1988 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card