Kuroma Kuroma

ainto.app scores 34/100 for AI Readiness

Ainto (ainto.app) scores 34/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (51) and its weakest is Authority Signals (24); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).

Audited URL: https://ainto.app

34/100
Grade
F

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is ainto.app ready for AI search?

Not yet: ainto.app scores 34/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 40
Technical Optimization 51
Authority Signals 24
AI Readiness 26

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 56/100

    Found: 667 words, 20 paragraphs, 2 images (2 with alt text)

    • Content length (667 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: SoftwareApplication

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    Average 8 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 6. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 64/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Ainto", "Ainto").

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 60/100

    1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    5 render-blocking resources. 425 elements for 667 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 1 placeholder links

    • 1 of 25 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at ainto.app is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 53/100

    23 external links, 1 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 15/100

    Present: SSL

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 15/100

    2 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 10/100

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 17/100

    1 of 51 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 63/100

    Score: 63/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    667 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card