Kuroma
ettoday.com scores 28/100 for AI Readiness
EasyTime TODAY (ettoday.com) scores 28/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (53) and its weakest is Authority Signals (12); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://ettoday.com
The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 9 points off the overall score.
Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites
Is ettoday.com ready for AI search?
Not yet: ettoday.com scores 28/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Add External Citations & References up to +9 pts
On https://ettoday.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 0/100
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
- Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.9 pts
On https://ettoday.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 39/100
- Missing canonical tag
- The response at ettoday.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
- Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
- This page opens 15 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
- Serve a plain-text robots.txt at ettoday.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts
On https://ettoday.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100
- Limited use of specific statistics
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +7 pts
On https://ettoday.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
- Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
- Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
- Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +7 pts
On https://ettoday.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 0/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
The 18 checks scored on this page
Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 1 more check was not scored on this page and is listed below with no score.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Found: 277 words, 14 paragraphs
- Content length (277 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- Limited use of lists for scannable content
-
7% of the overall score
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
4.8% of the overall score
No JSON-LD structured data found
- No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
-
3.2% of the overall score
Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
3% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 12, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.
-
Media Accessibility Not applicable
Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category
Not scored on this page: no images, video or audio to make readable
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
0 valid schemas
-
2% of the overall score
1 render-blocking resources. 115 elements for 277 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable)
- Missing canonical tag
- The response at ettoday.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Contact
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
1 of 13 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
5.7% of the overall score
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
5.1% of the overall score
0 of 15 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 73/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
277 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card