Kuroma
adhdreading.org scores 59/100 for AI Readiness
ADHD Reading (adhdreading.org) scores 59/100 (grade A) on AI Readiness, audited 26 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (74) and its weakest is AI Readiness (52); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 0/100 (No recent year references in content). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://adhdreading.org
The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 47/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 6.9 points off the overall score.
This audit is 19 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites
Is adhdreading.org ready for AI search?
Largely yes: adhdreading.org scores 59/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.9 pts
On https://adhdreading.org · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 47/100
- 2 of 48 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- The response at adhdreading.org is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
- This page opens 16 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
- Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
- Serve a plain-text robots.txt at adhdreading.org — the response we received could not be parsed as one
-
Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts
On https://adhdreading.org · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5 pts
On https://adhdreading.org · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 29/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts
On https://adhdreading.org · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts
On https://adhdreading.org · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 1288 words, 63 paragraphs, 8 lists, 35 images (35 with alt text)
-
6.5% of the overall score
FAQ schema present. 23 question headings. 7 questions detected in content
-
4.5% of the overall score
4 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: FAQPage, Organization, SoftwareApplication, WebSite
-
3% of the overall score
Average 10 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 6, H3: 19. Proper hierarchy.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 15 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Original webpage", "Alex Mitchell", "Sarah Jenkins").
- 17 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 35 images but only ~1288 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
4 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
4 render-blocking resources. 1008 elements for 1288 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 2 responsive images
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 2 placeholder links
- 2 of 48 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- The response at adhdreading.org is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 10/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
25 external links, 0 citation phrases, 10 statistics. No references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
15 of 46 headings open a quotable passage, 4 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 7 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
5.1% of the overall score
2 of 106 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 4 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 96/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
1288 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card