Kuroma Kuroma

bymyway.com scores 31/100 for AI Readiness

大樹教育顧問 (bymyway.com) scores 31/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 19 Jul 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (86) and its weakest is Authority Signals (9); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No JSON-LD structured data found).

Audited URL: https://bymyway.com

31/100
Grade
F

This audit is 59 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 59 days ago

Is bymyway.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: bymyway.com scores 31/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Implement Comprehensive Schema Markup.

Category scores

This audit did not record which rubric version scored it, so it is not confirmed as the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 16
Technical Optimization 86
Authority Signals 9
AI Readiness 25

The 16 checks this audit confirms it scored

Every check this audit confirms it scored, with what it found on the page. 3 other checks are listed without a share of the score, because this audit cannot confirm whether they counted on this page.

On-Page Content

  • Found: 857 words

    • Content length (857 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
  • Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No JSON-LD structured data found
  • AI Readability Score Needs work 35/100

    Average 3 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Fail 0/100

    H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Insufficient H2 headings for content sections
  • Media Accessibility Pass 85/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 12/100

    Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    Experience: 0/25. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • 0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 15/100

    Present: SSL

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • 0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 tables

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 20/100

    Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 65/100

    References current year

    • No article publish/modified dates in metadata
  • 1 unique value phrases, 1 differentiators, 0 case study mentions.

    • No case studies or concrete examples found
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 0/100

    Score: 0/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    857 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card