Kuroma Kuroma

funasho-group.co.jp scores 43/100 for AI Readiness

Funasho Co., Ltd. (funasho-group.co.jp) is a Supply Chain / Logistics site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 43/100 (grade C), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (79) and its weakest is AI Readiness (28); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 341 Supply Chain / Logistics sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://funasho-group.co.jp

43/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 44 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 44 days ago

Top 25% in Supply Chain / Logistics Median 37 · Top quartile 42 · across 341 audited sites in Supply Chain / Logistics

Is funasho-group.co.jp ready for AI search?

Partly: funasho-group.co.jp scores 43/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 36
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 79
Authority Signals 25% of the score 41
AI Readiness 30% of the score 28

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://funasho-group.co.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://funasho-group.co.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://funasho-group.co.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.5 pts

    On https://funasho-group.co.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 22/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Update Content Freshness up to +5.4 pts

    On https://funasho-group.co.jp · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 5/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 64/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 367 words, 17 paragraphs, 23 lists, 29 images (15 with alt text)

    • Content length (367 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 14 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 7/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: CollectionPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

  • AI Readability Score Partial 68/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 75/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 5, H3: 1. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 27/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 14 of 29 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 12 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("FUNASHO GROUP", "FUNASHO GROUP", "Language").
    • 7 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 29 images but only ~367 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 44/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (5317ms). 9 render-blocking resources. 425 elements for 367 words

    • Server response was slow (5317ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 3 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 86/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 22/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    6 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 62/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 60/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    4 of 6 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 5/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 27 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 75/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 75/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    367 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Supply Chain / Logistics sites

Other Supply Chain / Logistics sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.