Kuroma Kuroma

www.zoller.info scores 44/100 for AI Readiness

Start with a Solution (www.zoller.info) scores 44/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 17 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (60) and its weakest is AI Readiness (32); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 30 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it above the median of the 31,080 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.zoller.info

44/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 6/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 6.1 points off the overall score.

This audit is 13 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 13 days ago

Above the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 31,080 audited sites

Is www.zoller.info ready for AI search?

Partly: www.zoller.info scores 44/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 44
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 60
Authority Signals 25% of the score 46
AI Readiness 30% of the score 32

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.1 pts

    On https://www.zoller.info · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 6/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.1 pts

    On https://www.zoller.info · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 53/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 12 of 207 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.zoller.info is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at www.zoller.info — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.1 pts

    On https://www.zoller.info · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 18/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +5.1 pts

    On https://www.zoller.info · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 43/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.9 pts

    On https://www.zoller.info · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 30/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 83/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1,416 words, 127 paragraphs, 45 lists, 68 images (47 with alt text)

    • 21 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 6/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebSite

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 30 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 3 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 89/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 6, H3: 10. Hierarchy issues.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 32/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 21 of 68 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 11 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("ZOLLER Logo", "MYZOLLER Logo", "ZOLLER Logo").
    • 9 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 68 images but only ~1,416 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 69/100

    2% of the overall score

    9 render-blocking resources. 1,505 elements for 1,416 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 13 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 53/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 12 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 12 of 207 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.zoller.info is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 30/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 43/100

    9% of the overall score

    21 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 61/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (2)

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 51/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    3 of 18 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 18/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 5/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 119 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 35/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 35/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1,416 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card