Kuroma
hubspot.com scores 65/100 for AI Readiness
HubSpot (hubspot.com) is a SaaS / CRM Platform site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 65/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (79) and its weakest is AI Readiness (45); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 0/100 (No recent year references in content). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://hubspot.com
The most points to recover are in Content Freshness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 5.7% of the total, which takes 5.7 points off the overall score.
This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites
Is hubspot.com ready for AI search?
Largely yes: hubspot.com scores 65/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Update Content Freshness and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts
On https://hubspot.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.5 pts
On https://hubspot.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 40/100
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.3 pts
On https://hubspot.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 36/100
- Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
- Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.2 pts
On https://hubspot.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 30/100
- Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +2.7 pts
On https://hubspot.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 61/100
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 2077 words, 86 paragraphs, 77 lists, 84 images (70 with alt text)
- 14 images missing alt text
-
6.5% of the overall score
No FAQ structure. 5 question headings. 1 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
-
4.5% of the overall score
1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, WebPage, Product
-
3% of the overall score
Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 6, H3: 18. Proper hierarchy.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 14 of 84 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 56 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("HubSpot", "HubSpot", "195309752641").
- 10 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 84 images but only ~2077 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
42 render-blocking resources. 2674 elements for 2077 words
- 42 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 30 responsive images. has theme-color
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 21/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 10/25. Has author
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
17 external links, 0 citation phrases, 14 statistics. Has references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (6)
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
3 of 25 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 12 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
5.1% of the overall score
6 of 200 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 76/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
2077 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card