Kuroma Kuroma

ez.wiki scores 11/100 for AI Readiness

ez.wiki scores 11/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 17 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (38) and its weakest is Authority Signals (0); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://ez.wiki

11/100
Grade
F

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 20/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 10.4 points off the overall score.

This audit is 29 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 29 days ago

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is ez.wiki ready for AI search?

Not yet: ez.wiki scores 11/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 11
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 38
Authority Signals 25% of the score 0
AI Readiness 30% of the score 3

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +10.4 pts

    On https://ez.wiki · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 20/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • This page opens 0 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Add a Sitemap directive to robots.txt to help crawlers discover pages
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +9 pts

    On https://ez.wiki · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 0/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Add Trust Signals up to +9 pts

    On https://ez.wiki · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 0/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://ez.wiki · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +7.2 pts

    On https://ez.wiki · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 0/100

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add a section heading followed by 25 to 200 words that answer it on their own, so an assistant can lift the answer without the rest of the page
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses

The 18 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 1 more check was not scored on this page and is listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Fail 8/100

    7% of the overall score

    Found: 62 words, 1 paragraphs

    • Content length (62 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    7% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.8% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3.2% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Fail 0/100

    3% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • No headings a reader can see
  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Not scored on this page: no images, video or audio to make readable

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 49/100

    2% of the overall score

    17 render-blocking resources. 205 elements for 62 words

    • 17 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 92/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Fail 20/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed

    • Missing canonical tag

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 0/100

    9% of the overall score

    0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 0/100

    9% of the overall score

    No trust signals found

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 0/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    0 of 0 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 4 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 24/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 24/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card