Kuroma
docs.maptiler.com scores 42/100 for AI Readiness
MapTiler documentation (docs.maptiler.com) scores 42/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 29 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (59) and its weakest is AI Readiness (24); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it above the median of the 31,080 sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://docs.maptiler.com
The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 10/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 6.8 points off the overall score.
Above the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 31,080 audited sites
Is docs.maptiler.com ready for AI search?
Not yet: docs.maptiler.com scores 42/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.8 pts
On https://docs.maptiler.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 10/100
- Limited use of specific statistics
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts
On https://docs.maptiler.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
- Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
- Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
- Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.2 pts
On https://docs.maptiler.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 52/100
- 49 of 475 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- The response at docs.maptiler.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
- Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
- Serve a plain-text robots.txt at docs.maptiler.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.8 pts
On https://docs.maptiler.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 17/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts
On https://docs.maptiler.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 1,206 words, 20 paragraphs, 78 lists, 10 images (10 with alt text)
-
6.5% of the overall score
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
4.5% of the overall score
1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: TechArticle
- No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 46 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
-
3% of the overall score
Average 9 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 10 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Ready Maps", "Visualization", "Streets").
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
4 render-blocking resources. 2,020 elements for 1,206 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. has theme-color
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 49 placeholder links
- 49 of 475 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- The response at docs.maptiler.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 7/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
10 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. Has references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (2 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (6)
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
1 of 7 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 1 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
5.7% of the overall score
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
5.1% of the overall score
0 of 71 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 82/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
1,206 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card