Kuroma Kuroma

skilbrill.com scores 45/100 for AI Readiness

Software Training Institute in Chennai (skilbrill.com) scores 45/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 22 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (73) and its weakest is AI Readiness (30); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 0/100 (Limited use of specific statistics). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://skilbrill.com

45/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 8/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 8.3 points off the overall score.

This audit is 23 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 23 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is skilbrill.com ready for AI search?

Partly: skilbrill.com scores 45/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 44
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 73
Authority Signals 25% of the score 41
AI Readiness 30% of the score 30

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +8.3 pts

    On https://skilbrill.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 8/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://skilbrill.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +5.3 pts

    On https://skilbrill.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 19/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://skilbrill.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.1 pts

    On https://skilbrill.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 9/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 62/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 436 words, 9 paragraphs, 4 lists, 2 images (2 with alt text)

    • Content length (436 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 19/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 9/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: EducationalOrganization, Organization, WebSite, LocalBusiness, ImageObject, PostalAddress, GeoCoordinates, Place, WebPage, BreadcrumbList

  • AI Readability Score Pass 80/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 4 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 71/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 6. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Partial 60/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("📞").
    • 1 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 51/100

    2% of the overall score

    45 render-blocking resources. 453 elements for 436 words

    • 45 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 1 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 71/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 3 placeholder links

    • 3 of 26 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 48/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Fail 8/100

    9% of the overall score

    0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 69/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 49/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    6 of 19 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 65/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 7/27/2026

    • No recent year references in content
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 24 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 56/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 56/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card