Kuroma Kuroma

english.rikkyo.ac.jp scores 43/100 for AI Readiness

Rikkyo University Official Website (english.rikkyo.ac.jp) is a Online Learning / Course Platform site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 43/100 (grade C), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (60) and its weakest is AI Readiness (34); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it above the median of the 208 Online Learning / Course Platform sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://english.rikkyo.ac.jp

43/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

Updated 1 day ago

Above the median in Online Learning / Course Platform Median 41 · Top quartile 46 · across 208 audited sites in Online Learning / Course Platform

Is english.rikkyo.ac.jp ready for AI search?

Partly: english.rikkyo.ac.jp scores 43/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 43
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 60
Authority Signals 25% of the score 40
AI Readiness 30% of the score 34

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://english.rikkyo.ac.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://english.rikkyo.ac.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://english.rikkyo.ac.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  4. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +5.2 pts

    On https://english.rikkyo.ac.jp · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 60/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 11 of 83 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 36 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  5. Add Trust Signals up to +4.8 pts

    On https://english.rikkyo.ac.jp · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 47/100

    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 72/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 713 words, 26 paragraphs, 16 lists, 9 images (5 with alt text)

    • Content length (713 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 4 images missing alt text (e.g. /tf7f8e0000001t69-img/dn4ddm0000003n3y.jpg, /tf7f8e0000001t69-img/tf7f8e0000001tcz.jpg, /tf7f8e0000001t69-img/tf7f8e0000001td8.jpg)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 13/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: CollegeOrUniversity

  • AI Readability Score Pass 80/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 13 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 88/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 6, H3: 8. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 34/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 4 of 9 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 4 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Twitter", "Facebook", "Instagram").
    • 4 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 80/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    13 render-blocking resources. 593 elements for 713 words

    • 13 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 50/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 60/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 11 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 11 of 83 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 39/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    12 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 47/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 54/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    4 of 18 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 67/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 3/27/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 5/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 44 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 72/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 72/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Online Learning / Course Platform sites

Other Online Learning / Course Platform sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.