Kuroma Kuroma

www.ntust.edu.tw scores 36/100 for AI Readiness

National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (www.ntust.edu.tw) scores 36/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 19 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (46) and its weakest is Authority Signals (24); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 31,104 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.ntust.edu.tw/

36/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 41/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 13 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 13 days ago

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 31,104 audited sites

Is www.ntust.edu.tw ready for AI search?

Not yet: www.ntust.edu.tw scores 36/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 45
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 46
Authority Signals 25% of the score 24
AI Readiness 30% of the score 31

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.7 pts

    On https://www.ntust.edu.tw/ · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 41/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 8 of 131 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.ntust.edu.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • This page opens 83 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Add Trust Signals up to +7.6 pts

    On https://www.ntust.edu.tw/ · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 16/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.8 pts

    On https://www.ntust.edu.tw/ · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 10/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://www.ntust.edu.tw/ · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://www.ntust.edu.tw/ · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 92/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 713 words, 15 paragraphs, 10 lists, 5 tables, 40 images (40 with alt text)

    • Content length (713 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 30/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Needs work 35/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

    • No block of writing on this page reads as a paragraph, so paragraph length could not be judged
  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 75/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 5, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 43/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 19 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Picture description", "Picture description", "Picture description").
    • 39 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 40 images but only ~713 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Fail 20/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    2 render-blocking resources. 679 elements for 713 words

  • Mobile Optimization Needs work 42/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

    • Viewport not configured for device width
  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 8 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 8 of 131 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.ntust.edu.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 21/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    6 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 16/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Legal notice, Social profiles (3)

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 25/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    1 of 5 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 5 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 10/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 54/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 10/1/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 5/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 63 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 63/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 63/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    713 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card