Kuroma Kuroma

seedaud.io scores 62/100 for AI Readiness

Seed Audio AI (seedaud.io) scores 62/100 (grade A) on AI Readiness, audited 26 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (80) and its weakest is Authority Signals (52); the biggest single gap is E-E-A-T Signals at 20/100 (No author attribution found). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://seedaud.io

62/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 47/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 6.9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 19 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 19 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is seedaud.io ready for AI search?

Largely yes: seedaud.io scores 62/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 80
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 61
Authority Signals 25% of the score 52
AI Readiness 30% of the score 57

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.9 pts

    On https://seedaud.io · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 47/100

    • 8 of 70 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at seedaud.io is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • This page opens 33 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at seedaud.io — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.6 pts

    On https://seedaud.io · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 20/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts

    On https://seedaud.io · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://seedaud.io · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.4 pts

    On https://seedaud.io · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 33/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • 6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1809 words, 106 paragraphs, 10 lists, 2 tables, 41 images (29 with alt text)

    • 12 images missing alt text
  • 6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 11 question headings. 8 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 45/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    6 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, WebPage, WebApplication, FAQPage, BreadcrumbList

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 5 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 85/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 11, H3: 36. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 43/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 12 of 41 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 18 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Visa", "Mastercard", "American Express").
    • 11 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 41 images but only ~1809 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • 1% of the overall score

    6 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • 2% of the overall score

    2 render-blocking resources. 1435 elements for 1809 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 77/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 4 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 47/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 8 placeholder links

    • 8 of 70 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at seedaud.io is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 20/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • 9% of the overall score

    10 external links, 0 citation phrases, 28 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 74/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (1)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 92/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    13 of 48 headings open a quotable passage, 3 definitions, 2 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 30/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 45/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 7/26/2026

    • No recent year references in content
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 33/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    7 of 168 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 3 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 85/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1809 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card