Kuroma Kuroma

corti.ai scores 51/100 for AI Readiness

AI Platform for Healthcare Developers (corti.ai) scores 51/100 (grade B) on AI Readiness, audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Authority Signals (71) and its weakest is On-Page Content (36); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://corti.ai

51/100
Grade
B

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 22/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 5.9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is corti.ai ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: corti.ai scores 51/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 36
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 58
Authority Signals 25% of the score 71
AI Readiness 30% of the score 42

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.9 pts

    On https://corti.ai · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 22/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +5.6 pts

    On https://corti.ai · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 57/100

    • The response at corti.ai is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • This page opens 58 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at corti.ai — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +5.3 pts

    On https://corti.ai · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 19/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://corti.ai · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Break enumerable points into a list of three or more items rather than a run-on paragraph
  5. Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts

    On https://corti.ai · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 55/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 609 words, 50 paragraphs, 83 images (1 with alt text)

    • Content length (609 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
    • 82 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 19/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 5 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 70/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 11. Hierarchy issues.

  • Media Accessibility Fail 12/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 82 of 83 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Corti logo").
    • 79 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 83 images but only ~609 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 60/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 41/100

    2% of the overall score

    24 render-blocking resources. 1580 elements for 609 words

    • 24 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 9 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 57/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 1 placeholder links

    • The response at corti.ai is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 56/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 25/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    14 external links, 0 citation phrases, 5 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 85/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 49/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    6 of 20 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 22/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 37/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    3 of 68 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 80/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 80/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    609 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card