Kuroma Kuroma

lauda.de scores 44/100 for AI Readiness

Temperiertechnik und Kältetechnik für Industrie und Labor (lauda.de) scores 44/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 30 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (57) and its weakest is AI Readiness (32); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 0/100 (Limited use of specific statistics). That places it above the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://lauda.de

44/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 15 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 15 days ago

Above the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is lauda.de ready for AI search?

Partly: lauda.de scores 44/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 57
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 57
Authority Signals 25% of the score 35
AI Readiness 30% of the score 32

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://lauda.de · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.1 pts

    On https://lauda.de · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 53/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 15 of 268 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at lauda.de is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at lauda.de — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://lauda.de · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.3 pts

    On https://lauda.de · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 24/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://lauda.de · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 95/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1625 words, 83 paragraphs, 16 lists, 149 images (120 with alt text)

    • 29 images missing alt text (e.g. /fileadmin/assets/Bilder/Microsite/Tag_der_offenen_Tuer_2026/tag-der-offenen-tuer-keyvisual-1-mobile.jpg, /fileadmin/_processed_/8/c/csm_tag-der-offenen-tuer-keyvisual-1_6e2d522dd5.jpg, /fileadmin/assets/Bi…
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 25/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 13/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Pass 89/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 98/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 12. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 26/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 29 of 148 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 97 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Deutsch", "English (Global)", "Français").
    • 32 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 148 images but only ~1625 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 30/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 56/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (13181ms). 3 render-blocking resources. 2179 elements for 1625 words

    • Server response was slow (13181ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 77/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 13 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 53/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 15 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 15 of 268 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at lauda.de is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 24/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    14 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 44/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (4)

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 50/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    8 of 20 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 66/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 9/6/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 100 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 27/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 27/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1625 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card