Kuroma Kuroma

realself.com scores 65/100 for AI Readiness

RealSelf (realself.com) is a Medical Aesthetics site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 65/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (85) and its weakest is AI Readiness (48); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 0/100 (No recent year references in content). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://realself.com

65/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Content Freshness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 5.7% of the total, which takes 5.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is realself.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: realself.com scores 65/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Update Content Freshness and Improve Page Performance Indicators.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 66
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 85
Authority Signals 25% of the score 69
AI Readiness 30% of the score 48

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://realself.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.5 pts

    On https://realself.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 40/100

    • Hedged language is frequent (9 hedge words per 100 sentences), which weakens citation-worthiness
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.4 pts

    On https://realself.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 52/100

    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +3.2 pts

    On https://realself.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 65/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  5. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +2.8 pts

    On https://realself.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 57/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3400 words, 180 paragraphs, 20 lists, 53 images (39 with alt text)

    • 14 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 57/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 2 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 38/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    18 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types:

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 6 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 85/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 3, H2: 9, H3: 30. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (3) - should have exactly one
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 46/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 7 of 46 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 21 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Microneedling", "See All", "Rhinoplasty").
    • 38 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    18 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 35/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3054ms). 26 render-blocking resources. 1715 elements for 3400 words

    • Server response was slow (3054ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 26 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 46 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 93/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 1 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 52/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 4/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 65/100

    9% of the overall score

    50 external links, 1 citation phrases, 15 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 86/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (7)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 61/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    6 of 42 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 5 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Hedged language is frequent (9 hedge words per 100 sentences), which weakens citation-worthiness
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 60/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    10 of 203 passages carry a figure, 5 set two figures against each other, 4 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 82/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 82/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3400 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Medical Aesthetics sites

Other Medical Aesthetics sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.