Kuroma Kuroma

www.pinkfloyd.com scores 36/100 for AI Readiness

Pink Floyd (www.pinkfloyd.com) scores 36/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (54) and its weakest is AI Readiness (28); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 30,931 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.pinkfloyd.com

36/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

Updated 1 day ago

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,931 audited sites

Is www.pinkfloyd.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: www.pinkfloyd.com scores 36/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 36
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 54
Authority Signals 25% of the score 33
AI Readiness 30% of the score 28

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://www.pinkfloyd.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.9 pts

    On https://www.pinkfloyd.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 47/100

    • 7 of 88 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.pinkfloyd.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • This page opens 27 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at www.pinkfloyd.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://www.pinkfloyd.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://www.pinkfloyd.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.7 pts

    On https://www.pinkfloyd.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 18/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 63/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 793 words, 8 paragraphs, 338 images (309 with alt text)

    • Content length (793 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
    • 29 images missing alt text (e.g. (inline image), (inline image), (inline image))
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Partial 69/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 3 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 78/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 7, H3: 4. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 33/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 21 of 263 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 15 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Home", "Home-1", "Home-2").
    • 246 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 263 images but only ~793 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 80/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 51/100

    2% of the overall score

    27 render-blocking resources. 1,350 elements for 793 words

    • 27 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 67 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 47/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 7 placeholder links

    • 7 of 88 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.pinkfloyd.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 18/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 4/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    34 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 44/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)

    • No about or company page linked from this page

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 25/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    0 of 16 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 62/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 8/5/2026

    • No recent year references in content
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 42 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 56/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 56/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    793 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card