Kuroma Kuroma

digibouquetai.com scores 45/100 for AI Readiness

DigiBouquet AI (digibouquetai.com) scores 45/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 26 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (61) and its weakest is Authority Signals (30); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://digibouquetai.com

45/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 20/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 7.2 points off the overall score.

This audit is 19 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 19 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is digibouquetai.com ready for AI search?

Partly: digibouquetai.com scores 45/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 57
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 61
Authority Signals 25% of the score 30
AI Readiness 30% of the score 37

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +7.2 pts

    On https://digibouquetai.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 20/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +7 pts

    On https://digibouquetai.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 0/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.1 pts

    On https://digibouquetai.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 53/100

    • 3 of 94 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at digibouquetai.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • This page opens 44 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at digibouquetai.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.9 pts

    On https://digibouquetai.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 22/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://digibouquetai.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 72/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1014 words, 59 paragraphs, 35 images (28 with alt text)

    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
    • 7 images missing alt text (e.g. /brand/logo-flower.webp, /marketing/hero-ai-bouquet.webp, /home-cases/watercolor-v2.webp)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 65/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ section found (no schema). 4 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, SoftwareApplication

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 74/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 17, H3: 30. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 50/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 14 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Rose", "Peony", "Tulip").
    • 28 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 28 images but only ~1014 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    1 render-blocking resources. 643 elements for 1014 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 53/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 3 placeholder links

    • 3 of 94 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at digibouquetai.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 20/100

    9% of the overall score

    0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 5 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 62/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 56/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    5 of 48 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 22/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 35/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    3 of 111 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 68/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 68/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1014 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card