Kuroma Kuroma

porncraft.me scores 42/100 for AI Readiness

PornCraft (porncraft.me) scores 42/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (59) and its weakest is Authority Signals (21); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 2 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it above the median of the 30,931 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://porncraft.me

42/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 15/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 7.7 points off the overall score.

Updated 1 day ago

Above the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,931 audited sites

Is porncraft.me ready for AI search?

Not yet: porncraft.me scores 42/100 (grade D). Start with Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 57
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 59
Authority Signals 25% of the score 21
AI Readiness 30% of the score 34

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +7.7 pts

    On https://porncraft.me · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 15/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://porncraft.me · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7 pts

    On https://porncraft.me · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 46/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • The response at porncraft.me is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 15 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at porncraft.me — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.4 pts

    On https://porncraft.me · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 9/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Add Trust Signals up to +5.7 pts

    On https://porncraft.me · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 37/100

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Your Organization schema declares 3 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 77/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 580 words, 23 paragraphs, 3 lists, 6 images (6 with alt text)

    • Content length (580 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 62/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 10 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, Organization

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 2 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 69/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 73/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 3, H3: 21. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Partial 58/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Background image").
    • 6 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    1 render-blocking resources. 536 elements for 580 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 46/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable)

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • The response at porncraft.me is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 9/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 15/100

    9% of the overall score

    1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 37/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 67/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    7 of 25 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 46 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 69/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 69/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    580 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card