Kuroma
chineseface.app scores 57/100 for AI Readiness
Chinese Face Reading from Your Photo (chineseface.app) scores 57/100 (grade B) on AI Readiness, audited 18 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (80) and its weakest is AI Readiness (36); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 0/100 (No recent year references in content). That places it in the top quartile of the 31,080 sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://chineseface.app
The most points to recover are in E-E-A-T Signals: it scored 17/100 on a check worth 7% of the total, which takes 5.8 points off the overall score.
This audit is 12 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 31,080 audited sites
Is chineseface.app ready for AI search?
Mostly, with gaps: chineseface.app scores 57/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.8 pts
On https://chineseface.app · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 17/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts
On https://chineseface.app · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.1 pts
On https://chineseface.app · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 32/100
- Limited use of specific statistics
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.8 pts
On https://chineseface.app · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 5/100
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
- Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
- Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
-
Add External Citations & References up to +4.5 pts
On https://chineseface.app · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 50/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 1,669 words, 77 paragraphs, 10 lists, 22 images (20 with alt text)
- 2 images missing alt text (e.g. /images/art/seal.webp, /images/art/seal.webp)
-
6.5% of the overall score
FAQ schema present. 12 question headings. 3 questions detected in content
-
4.5% of the overall score
2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebApplication, FAQPage
-
3% of the overall score
Average 9 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 14, H3: 43. Proper hierarchy.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 4 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("ChineseFace logo", "ChineseFace logo", "ChineseFace logo").
- 5 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
2 valid schemas, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
7 render-blocking resources. 986 elements for 1,669 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 7 placeholder links
- 7 of 84 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 7/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
9 external links, 0 citation phrases, 4 statistics. No references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (2 identity properties), Privacy Policy
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
18 of 58 headings open a quotable passage, 3 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 3 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
5.7% of the overall score
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
5.1% of the overall score
0 of 130 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 76/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none
- This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card