Kuroma
qmetrix.com.au scores 73/100 for AI Readiness
QMetrix (qmetrix.com.au) is a FP&A & CPM site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 73/100 (grade A+), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (89) and its weakest is Authority Signals (63); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 16/100 (1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://qmetrix.com.au
The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 50/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 4.5 points off the overall score.
This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites
Is qmetrix.com.au ready for AI search?
Largely yes: qmetrix.com.au scores 73/100 (grade A+). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Add External Citations & References up to +4.5 pts
On https://qmetrix.com.au · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 50/100
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
- Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.8 pts
On https://qmetrix.com.au · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 16/100
- Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.7 pts
On https://qmetrix.com.au · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 27/100
- Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +2.5 pts
On https://qmetrix.com.au · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 65/100
- No author attribution found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Add Trust Signals up to +2.3 pts
On https://qmetrix.com.au · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 75/100
- Your Organization schema declares 4 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
- Add customer testimonials or reviews
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 7563 words, 224 paragraphs, 49 lists, 214 images (118 with alt text)
- 96 images missing alt text
-
6.5% of the overall score
No FAQ structure. 33 question headings. 10 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
-
4.5% of the overall score
1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization
-
3% of the overall score
Average 11 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 9, H3: 175. Proper hierarchy.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 96 of 214 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 13 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("QMetrix", "Workday Logo", "QMetrix-team-estee-ryan-consultants-assistance").
- 198 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 214 images but only ~7563 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
1 render-blocking resources. 4920 elements for 7563 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 5 placeholder links
- Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 10/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 20/25
- No author attribution found
-
9% of the overall score
2 external links, 0 citation phrases, 8 statistics. Has references section.
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (3)
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
103 of 185 headings open a quotable passage, 16 definitions, 0 comparison structures
-
7.5% of the overall score
4 original data indicators, 7 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
References current year. Last modified: 6/30/2026
-
5.1% of the overall score
7 of 479 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 85/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
7563 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther FP&A & CPM sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.