Kuroma Kuroma

robertsspaceindustries.com scores 28/100 for AI Readiness

Roberts Space Industries (robertsspaceindustries.com) scores 28/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (65) and its weakest is AI Readiness (11); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://robertsspaceindustries.com

28/100
Grade
F

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is robertsspaceindustries.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: robertsspaceindustries.com scores 28/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 23
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 65
Authority Signals 25% of the score 24
AI Readiness 30% of the score 11

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://robertsspaceindustries.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add Trust Signals up to +6.7 pts

    On https://robertsspaceindustries.com · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 26/100

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://robertsspaceindustries.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.5 pts

    On https://robertsspaceindustries.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 7/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://robertsspaceindustries.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Needs work 30/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 86 words, 13 paragraphs, 4 images (0 with alt text)

    • Content length (86 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
    • 4 images missing alt text (e.g. /i/ae389904b52729eee87be4b55e1ac63070584c1b/resize(1920,1080,cover,crop(1920,1080,0,0,ADdPNihJzmPbNuTnFsH1DqUeqBRpXdSXVVtgJTyDDgscGKrzJuoFjReseMCFsutiTFpBaQWany2DkEwFDbuRHeazJ))/85/heap-thumbnail-49.webp, /i…
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types:

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Pass 80/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 5 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 45/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 3, H2: 0, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

    • Multiple H1 headings (3) - should have exactly one
    • Insufficient section headings to break the content up
  • Media Accessibility Fail 4/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 4 of 4 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 4 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 4 images but only ~86 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
    • 1 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 40/100

    2% of the overall score

    18 render-blocking resources. 506 elements for 86 words

    • 18 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
    • The page spends 506 HTML elements on 86 words of content, so crawlers parse far more markup than answer
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 72/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 2 of 31 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 7/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    14 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 26/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Social profiles (5)

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 27/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    0 of 3 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 8 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 44/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 44/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card