Kuroma Kuroma

grass.camp scores 45/100 for AI Readiness

GRASS (grass.camp) scores 45/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (55) and its weakest is AI Readiness (35); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 2 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar).

Audited URL: https://grass.camp

45/100
Grade
C

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is grass.camp ready for AI search?

Partly: grass.camp scores 45/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Expand Content Depth & Comprehensiveness.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 55
Technical Optimization 49
Authority Signals 45
AI Readiness 35

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 72/100

    Found: 491 words, 25 paragraphs, 2 lists, 9 images (9 with alt text)

    • Content length (491 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 53/100

    No FAQ structure. 7 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types:

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 2 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 87/100

    H1: 1, H2: 4, H3: 8. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 59/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    4 render-blocking resources. 411 elements for 491 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    Has viewport. 3 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 30/100

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 3 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 3 of 29 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at grass.camp is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 15/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 50/100

    12 external links, 0 citation phrases, 3 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 62/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Testimonials, Social Links

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 38/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 32/100

    0 original data indicators, 2 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 5/100

    0 of 39 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 63/100

    Score: 63/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    491 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card