Kuroma Kuroma

gigsky.com scores 65/100 for AI Readiness

International eSIM (gigsky.com) is a eSIM Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 65/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (79) and its weakest is AI Readiness (54); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 5/100 (No recent year references in content). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://gigsky.com

65/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Content Freshness: it scored 5/100 on a check worth 5.7% of the total, which takes 5.4 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is gigsky.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: gigsky.com scores 65/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 70
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 79
Authority Signals 25% of the score 62
AI Readiness 30% of the score 54

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Update Content Freshness up to +5.4 pts

    On https://gigsky.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 5/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.5 pts

    On https://gigsky.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 40/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://gigsky.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.8 pts

    On https://gigsky.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 16/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.8 pts

    On https://gigsky.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 46/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3724 words, 60 paragraphs, 4 lists, 779 images (17 with alt text)

    • 762 images missing alt text.svg, cdn.prod.website-files.com, cdn.prod.website-files.com)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 88/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ section found (no schema). 13 question headings. 9 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 16/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization

  • AI Readability Score Pass 88/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 15 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 89/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 2, H2: 12, H3: 12. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (2) - should have exactly one
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Fail 9/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 762 of 779 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 17 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("ca", "br", "ar").
    • 60 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 779 images but only ~3724 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 80/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 44/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3120ms). 10 render-blocking resources. 4843 elements for 3724 words

    • Server response was slow (3120ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 27 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 53 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 53 of 853 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 46/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    19 external links, 0 citation phrases, 68 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 82/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (6)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 70/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    19 of 28 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 16 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 5/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Pass 89/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    25 of 227 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 14 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 62/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 62/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3724 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited eSIM Services sites

Other eSIM Services sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.