Kuroma Kuroma

mysports.ai scores 67/100 for AI Readiness

Daily AI Sports Picks & Betting Predictions (mysports.ai) scores 67/100 (grade A) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (87) and its weakest is Authority Signals (41); the biggest single gap is E-E-A-T Signals at 23/100 (No author attribution found).

Audited URL: https://Mysports.ai

67/100
Grade
A

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is mysports.ai ready for AI search?

Largely yes: mysports.ai scores 67/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 83
Technical Optimization 87
Authority Signals 41
AI Readiness 61

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    Found: 1900 words, 52 paragraphs, 7 lists, 2 tables, 33 images (33 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 75/100

    FAQ schema present. 6 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Partial 70/100

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, SoftwareApplication, Product, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    Average 9 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    H1: 1, H2: 9, H3: 14. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 47/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 32 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Mysports.AI", "MLB", "Yankees").
    • 26 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 23/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9 external links, 0 citation phrases, 43 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 40/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 85/100

    2 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 2 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    0 original data indicators, 28 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 65/100

    13 of 149 passages carry a figure, 3 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 63/100

    Score: 63/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1900 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site →