Kuroma Kuroma

sensibo.com scores 66/100 for AI Readiness

Sensibo Smart Home Climate Control (sensibo.com) is a Smart Home & IoT site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 66/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (81) and its weakest is AI Readiness (49); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 0/100 (No recent year references in content). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://sensibo.com

66/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Content Freshness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 5.7% of the total, which takes 5.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is sensibo.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: sensibo.com scores 66/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 72
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 81
Authority Signals 25% of the score 67
AI Readiness 30% of the score 49

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://sensibo.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://sensibo.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://sensibo.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.5 pts

    On https://sensibo.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 22/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3.2 pts

    On https://sensibo.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 55/100

    • 9 of your 125 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3008 words, 100 paragraphs, 28 lists, 334 images (313 with alt text)

    • 21 images missing alt text (e.g. //sensibo.com/cdn/shop/files/image_10.png?v=1747917076&width=100, //sensibo.com/cdn/shop/files/image_11.png?v=1747917188&width=100, //sensibo.com/cdn/shop/files/sensibo-pure.svg?v=1680166094&width=100)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 86/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ section found (no schema). 10 question headings. 6 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 22/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    4 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, Product

  • AI Readability Score Pass 95/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 3 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 51/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 2, H2: 25, H3: 56. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (2) - should have exactly one
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 32/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 21 of 334 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 186 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Shop Sensibo", "smart-ac__PID:08c559b6-1ff0-420e-96a4-61868c566e4d", "smart-ac__PID:08c559b6-1ff0-420e-96a4-61868c566e4d").
    • 172 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 334 images but only ~3008 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    4 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 59/100

    2% of the overall score

    14 render-blocking resources. 3596 elements for 3008 words

    • 14 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 83/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 160 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 83/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 11 placeholder links

    • 11 of 223 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 58/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 22/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    7 external links, 0 citation phrases, 46 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 85/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 55/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    9 of 125 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 23 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 67/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    21 of 279 passages carry a figure, 3 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 67/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 67/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3008 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Smart Home & IoT sites

Other Smart Home & IoT sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.