Kuroma Kuroma

www.stem-solver.com scores 43/100 for AI Readiness

AI Math Solver (www.stem-solver.com) scores 43/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (58) and its weakest is Authority Signals (31); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 12/100 (Limited use of specific statistics).

Audited URL: https://www.stem-solver.com

43/100
Grade
C

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is www.stem-solver.com ready for AI search?

Partly: www.stem-solver.com scores 43/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 58
Technical Optimization 52
Authority Signals 31
AI Readiness 35

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 71/100

    Found: 710 words, 18 paragraphs, 6 lists, 8 images (6 with alt text)

    • Content length (710 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 2 images missing alt text (e.g. , )
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 41/100

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 4 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 22/100

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Person, Organization

  • AI Readability Score Pass 95/100

    Average 11 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 98/100

    H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 40/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 of 8 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("DeepSeek AI", "Claude AI").
    • 4 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 2 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    41 render-blocking resources. 654 elements for 710 words

    • 41 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    Has viewport. 1 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 1 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 1 of 32 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.stem-solver.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 26/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 50/100

    14 external links, 0 citation phrases, 3 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 15/100

    Present: SSL

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 25/100

    0 definitions, 1 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 12/100

    0 original data indicators, 3 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 57/100

    References current year. Last modified: 5/12/2025

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 22/100

    2 of 39 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 63/100

    Score: 63/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    710 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card